The Adriatic Council is a leading “pressure group”, devoted to helping eliminate poverty, protect human rights, preserve the environment and building a strong, competitive economy as well as building and deepening of democratic societies, based on cooperation with committed and respectable national governments.
Based in Slovenia, we work in the Adriatic Region with progressive civil society organizations and individuals to strengthen their voice, build their power and maximise their influence.
Pooling of economic potentials, awakening the people in the region so that they can confidently claim their respective, indispensable part of European heritage and become equal partner of both West and East.
The New Europe and the Old Europe, the South-East Europe or the Balkans, the Adriatic Region and the Eastern question: a geo-strategic picture of the area has been changing throughout history as both great powers and numerous individuals were aspiring to control this region.
The aspiration of Russia towards the warm seas, the German expansion towards the East as well as the remnants of interests after the collapse of the Ottoman Empire (above all by the great European powers to come by the Turkish legacy) shapes the region’s history from mid 19th century until present day. The Eastern question and its solution was, still is and will remain an important issue of the global politics, but also the destiny of the region’s peoples.
The people of Albania, Bosnia Herzegovina, Croatia, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia and Slovenia have often times been held hostage to decisions of great powers after peace conferences, but also silent power games observers; and regardless of how much they aspired to building their own identities and pursuing their interests, they were treated as tools in the hands of foreigners and forced to choose sides in order to secure their survival.
In the early 1990s, the Balkan country of Yugoslavia fell apart in a series of wars which saw ethnic cleansing and genocide return to Europe. The driving force was not age old ethnic tensions, but distinctly modern nationalisms, fanned by the media and driven by politicians. The crux was that as Yugoslavia collapsed, majority ethnicities pushed for independence, and these nationalist governments ignored their minorities, and some even actively persecuted them, often by forcing them out of jobs.
As propaganda made these minorities paranoid, they took to arms and eventually their actions led into a bloody set of wars. While the situation was rarely as clear as Serb vs Croat vs Muslim (or Orthodox vs Catholic vs Muslim) several civil wars erupted over centuries of ethnic and religious rivalry.
Many authors consider the region’s geo-strategic position an essential element of nations from the Alps to the Aegean Sea and from the Adriatic to the Black Sea. They argue that it had been this particular location what determined their political destinies.
Aspirations towards the Eurasian knot and the warm seas as well as campaigns from the North to the South and from the West to the East (and vice versa) have defined the Balkans and the entire Adriatic region as a bridge between the East and the West, but also as a gateway through which conquering armies had to pass.
The passage toll was usually high – although often not for the travellers but for those in their way. Or, as expressed locally, based on the experience: “Have we learned to read the road signs?”
Political and economic interdependence – which is evident but often neglected, be it for the interests of others or because local people wish to avoid the fate of their ancestors, but also because of contemporary European detachment – is the logical starting point for a new level of future cooperation, coordination of resources, definition of joint interests and above all creation of a powerful regional economic union, serving both as a gateway and a bridge between West and East.